=<>=+=+=<>=
conclusion of an earthday89 talk by Daniel Quinn (ishmael.org): The arms
race could only be ended in two ways. It could be ended by a catastrophe,
a nuclear holocaust. Or the participants could walk away from it. Luckily,
that's what happened: The Soviets called it quits—and there was no catastrophe.
The race between food and population is the same. It can be ended by catastrophe,
when simply too much of our planet's biomass is tied up in humans, and
fundamental ecological systems collapse. And if we refuse to abandon the
race, it will end that way—probably not in my lifetime, but very probably
in the lifetime of many of you. But the race doesn't have to end that way.
It can end the way the arms race ended, by people simply walking away from
it. We can say, "We understand now that there can be no final triumph of
food over population. This is because every single win made on the side
of food is answered by a win on the side of population. It has to be that
way, it always HAS been that way, and we can see that it's never going
to STOP being that way." The strange thing is that many people HATE hearing
all this—yet I'm clearly pointing out a path of possibility and hope. I'm
not a doom merchant, my compass is set firmly on success. Our population
explosion is a problem we CAN get a handle on, provided we all start reaching
for it with that third hand. -------------------------- 151003 fasting
cure in Taiwan account in the Guardian: hey, unusual item here but as it
happens I just found sapoty brook's defunct website (still to be had with
a google cache click and I shall rescue the material into a prfr soon -----
'fruit poetpiet raw food' should turn up a few links as well. -- google
cache (64K) of Sapoty Brook material extracted from his book Eco-Eating;
a very original and most scientific look at food value (emphasizing and
explaining why fruit is the most perfect food). ------ What is Eco Eating?
My Background --- --- Mineral Balancing --- The CaPNaK Chart --- Food Groups
Symptoms of Food Imbalancing --- Benefits of Intentional Imbalancing ---
How to Eat a live or raw food diet in a healthy way --- Core Raw Diet ---
The Five Basic Rules of Raw Eating Food Combining and other issues ---
Food Chakras --- Raw Benefits --- Order the book Eco-Eating Order The CaPNaK
Chart --- Order Chart and Cassette Package --- Email Me --- This page was
constructed by Christopher Barnaby Last updated 01.11.1999 What is Eco
Eating? ECO EATING is the know how to select foods to create the body and
mind you want, and reach optimum health without cooking. My name is Sapoty
Brook and I'm hoping that what I've to tell you now will transform your
body and mind. It can help you heal yourself, and heal the planet. Sometimes
I wonder what my profession is. For now I'm willing to call myself a Rejuvenation
Consultant. I'm interested in rejuvenating you and, through rejuvenating
you, helping the planet and the environment. ^ to top My Background My
university degrees are in science and electrical engineering with a master
of science degree in neural modeling . I've also worked and lived for 20
years with the live or raw food approach to eating and have written the
book entitled "eco-eating". How do I go about applying the idea of Eco-eating
in my life? We will get to that soon. First of all I must describe a little
background detail to make sure that you understand the process behind the
Eco-Eating way. This will be divided into two parts. The first part describes
the methods and benefits of mineral balancing, and how to use it in your
life to achieve optimum health and create the body and mind you want. The
second part describes how to apply mineral balancing to a live or raw food
diet and how to eat a raw food diet in a long term healthy way, easily
without any problems or difficulties. However, let me say at the beginning
that what I'm about to describe is a demanding and intensely transforming
practice. You may find at first that you have difficulties in applying
what I have to say, but as time goes on, its like driving a car, you'll
find it easier and easier, and eventually you'll find it so easy that you'll
wonder why everyone isn't doing it! Its of the utmost importance however
that anyone with any doubts about their physical condition must follow
these guidelines only under medical supervision - that especially includes
pregnant and breast feeding women, small children or the sick or elderly.
Its also important to maintain a good exercise program that keeps your
blood flowing and the tissues oxygenated. From an emotional and spiritual
point of view its very difficult to apply the information if there is a
backlog of unprocessed emotions in your mind. So I would suggest that anybody
who feels on the edge emotionally at all, should either find some counseling
or do some breath work and meditate . I highly recommend that you practice
meditation daily to provide a stable basis for the application of this
system and method of eating. The information here is based on the book
"Eco-Eating" ,which I wrote. "Eco" relates to ecological and its important
to realize that the ecological benefits of this diet and approach are just
as significant as the health benefits. Your garbage and energy used in
the kitchen and in the production of your food will be reduced to an absolute
minimum and this will have great benefits for the environment especially
if its adopted by many many people. ^ to top Mineral Balancing Now, the
first of the two main parts of this information page is on mineral balancing.
I developed a 'CaPNaK' chart for the understanding of this. The name CaPNaK
is a conglomeration of the abbreviated names of the minerals shown on the
chart. You can see here below an illustration of the chart for a clearer
understanding of what I am describing. The CaPNaK Chart I developed the
CaPNaK Chart after several years of working with a raw food diet, experimenting
and trying to optimize a raw food diet and finding difficulties in achieving
balance. Then, when I eventually discovered how to achieve balance in the
raw food diet, I found that I was confronted by a lot of people who really
and truly believed that this was impossible. So the CaPNaK Chart came out
of this confrontation. The basic idea is that in food there are four main
minerals: sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphorus. These minerals occur
in much larger quantities in food than the other minerals, and they have
very very significant and ubiquitous effects on the body and mind. With
these four minerals its well known that sodium and potassium can be seen
as a balancing pair as they both play a very important role in the fluid
balance in the body. There is more sodium outside the cells and more potassium
inside the cells and so the amount of fluid distributed between the inside
and outside of the cells is influenced by this sodium/potassium balance.
Other factors influenced by the sodium/potassium balance are, for example,
muscle contraction and nerve transmission, - so these two minerals are
very fundamental to the body and mind. The other two minerals, calcium
and phosphorus are also in balance. Phosphorus in the form of phosphates
has a major acidic affect on the body, whereas calcium is the major alkaline
mineral. Calcium stored in the bones is the alkaline buffer for the body.
When the body is overloaded with acid foods some alkaline calcium is withdrawn
from the bones to help re-balance the acidity of the phosphates and restore
the body to acid/alkaline balance. Slight disturbances in the balances
of both these pairs of minerals have big effects on the body and mind.
I wanted to express these balances graphically so that it would be very
accessible to you in terms of understanding and achieving rebalancing of
the minerals in your body. Now, the problem I ran into, of course, was
that there are four dimensions here - the four minerals require four dimensions
- so graphically speaking its impossible to display these four dimensions.
So the approach I took was to take into account the balanced ratio between
the two pairs of minerals. This then enabled me to take each food and subtract
out the balanced ratio for each pair of minerals. This left the remaining
residual amount of mineral that created an imbalance. For example consider
a banana - a banana is high in potassium and low in sodium. A certain balanced
ratio between potassium and sodium is fairly ideal for the average body
and if that's taken out of the banana then there is an excess of potassium
left over. So if I then show on the Chart how much potassium is left over
it gives a clear indication of the imbalancing effect of the banana. That
excess potassium must be dealt with in some way otherwise it creates symptoms
and effects in the body mind. This way I reduced the graph to two dimensions.
I plotted the positions of the foods according to the residual amounts
of minerals remaining after the balanced amounts of calcium-phosphorus
and sodium-potassium were taken out. I was then able to plot two directions
on the Chart and therefore show the unbalancing effect of each food by
its position or distance and direction from the centre of the Chart. So
once armed with this basic concept I went to the food composition tables
provided by various governments and other scientific groups. I took the
average mineral contents of each food and put the data through my computer
and determined the position of each food on the chart. Hence I was able
to construct the CaPNaK Chart. That was 10 years ago now, and since then
I and many other people have been using the CaPNaK Chart and finding great
benefits from understanding what effect particular foods are having on
the body and mind. You will notice if you look at the CaPNaK chart that
there are four colours. The colours indicate where each mineral predominates.
For example, in the blue area the calcium dominates and therefore the foods
are mainly alkaline, in the yellow area the sodium dominates and the foods
are mainly Yang. In the area between the blue and the yellow you would
call the foods Yang/Alkaline so neither is dominant. You will see a rectangular
area of a different shade around the center. Any foods outside that area
have been squashed in towards the center so that they fit on the chart.
For those who understand, the scale is linear inside and logarithmic outside
the rectangular area. I've taken the liberty of associating Yang with sodium
and Yin with potassium as a means of bridging the gap between the scientific
nutritional approach and the eastern style approach to nutrition, especially
macrobiotics. However there are some foods which are not positioned according
to how one would expect from a macrobiotic viewpoint. In this case I've
leant towards the scientific approach because of its fundamental foundation
in the atomic understanding of matter. Food Groups Now if you look carefully
at the Chart, for example look in the bottom left hand region in the Yang/Acid
area, many meats and fish are grouped together in that area. Different
food groups tend to group in different areas in this chart. So by knowing
where the different food groups are located you'll be able to start to
understand the different effects of the food groups on the body and mind.
For example nuts, grains and legumes are mainly located in the lower right
hand region, in the Yin/Acid area. Fruit, you'll notice, is located just
right of the center in the Yin or potassium direction, and dairy products
are located in the upper left hand region, in the Yang/Alkaline direction.
Seaweed and also some green vegetables are located in that area as well.
There are also many green vegetables in the upper right hand area, in the
Yin/Alkaline direction. Foods stay in approximately the same position whether
or not they are organic. Foods are shifted around the chart by additives.
For example whole meal bread is in the Yang/Acid region even though wheat
is in the Yin/Acid region. Why? Because sodium salt is usually added to
the dough. Similarly white bread is above whole meal bread on the chart
because the milk solids add more calcium than phosphorus. You will also
notice that tea, coffee, white sugar and oils are at the center of the
chart. They provide no residual minerals because they contain almost no
minerals. This does not mean they are healthy. They are unhealthy for other
reasons than their mineral content. Symptoms of Food Imbalancing I supply
along with the chart a Symptoms Diagram and a Benefits Diagram. You will
notice at the centre of the Symptoms Diagram and Benefits Diagram the same
four directions that are shown on the CaPNaK Chart, calcium, phosphorus,
sodium and potassium and these are in the same directions as they are on
the chart. See the example below for a clearer understanding of what I
mean. On the Symptoms Diagram there are various symptoms listed for being
imbalanced in each mineral direction. Taking the opposite pairs of symptoms
for example the pair for calcium and phosphorus, you'll be able to see
that there are some opposite or complementary effects. For example the
calcium foods will having a calming affect on the body, in overdose, making
you excessively calm, tranquil, lazy, or careless. Whereas the excessive
phosphorus foods will have the effect of making you anxious, paranoid,
restless, or worried. That can be good to a certain extent but when taken
too far can have negative effects on your body and mind. Due to our conditioning
and cravings, almost all of us are in some ways out of balance in regard
to these four main minerals and therefore we all tend to have some symptoms.
So we can all benefit by checking out the Symptoms Diagram and finding
out where our symptoms tend to lie. Now some of our symptoms will be always
present, and some will be sometimes present and sometimes not. So first
of all, the idea is to find which symptoms are the most pervasive ones
for you and which direction tends to be the most important for you to try
to rebalance. Say for example you find that you often feel very cold and
have bags under your eyes and maybe some swelling of the ankles. Then you
could conclude that you have got symptoms reminiscent of an overdose of
sodium or an under dose of potassium. So by eating more foods in the potassium
direction you would rebalance that. For example, Referring to the food
chart look at foods in the potassium direction. You could choose bananas
for example as a good food to reduce those symptoms of sodium overdose
and potassium under dose. The other way you can approach the problem is
also to reduce the high sodium foods that you may be eating. For example
you may be eating too much cheese or too much meat which you'll see on
the Yang side of the CaPNaK Chart. Lets say tomorrow you eat too many bananas,
say you eat four bananas in a row. You may get a bloated belly, indigestion,
feel faint and dizzy. These are Yin overdose symptoms. What will you do?
You'll need an antidote. So you run your finger across the chart from bananas
through the center to the diametrically opposite side. Look for a healthy
raw food in that region, for example celery is ideal. Three sticks of celery
will balance up the bananas, and half an hour later your negative symptoms
will be gone. When you get the Symptoms Diagram its worth taking some time
out now now and to have a look at the negative symptoms and find out which
direction you think you've gone too far in. You may find that there is
one particular direction of the sodium/potassium balance and one direction
of the calcium/phosphorus balance and you'll get the idea that you have
eaten too far into one region of the chart. So have a look at the foods
in that region and consider what times you might eat those sorts of foods
and whether you tend to get more of those negative symptoms at those times
or soon after those times. And look at the foods in the opposite region,
diametrically opposite through the centre of the Symptoms Diagram, and
you might find a lot of foods you don't have much affinity with - that
you dont enjoy very much. So the idea here is that we have to use our intellect
to overcome our conditioning and preferences which have been instilled
in us since childhood from our parents and our culture. Benefits of Intentional
Imbalancing That's a look at the negative effects of foods. Conversely,
there are corresponding positive effects and they are shown on a corresponding
Benefits Diagram I supply in my cassette package or with the chart itself.
The Benefits Diagram has the same four directions from the centre corresponding
to the four main minerals. On the Benefits Diagram you would see the positive
effects listed around the outside. For example, if you wanted to do some
sport, say yoga, then up in the alkaline direction towards the top you'll
see the second line from the top says "helps you relax and become tranquil".
Well, that would be good preparation for doing yoga wouldn't it? So you
could eat foods in that direction a couple of hours before doing yoga.
Also, eating over in the right hand side, the Yin or potassium side, you'll
see about fourth point down "loosens up your body". So eating in the potassium
or Yin direction would be a good idea to prepare for yoga as well: help
you stretch into those assanas. So eating in the calcium/potassium direction
or the Yin/Alkaline direction, in other words in the upper right area would
be good preparation for yoga. Look at the Yin/Alkaline region of the CaPNaK
Chart and see that you could, for example, have a salad with chives, okra
and broccoli in it. Or a little bit closer to the centre you'll see oranges,
so you could have a couple of oranges. The further the food is from the
centre the faster it will take you into the particular mind body state
associated with that direction from the centre. Each direction from the
centre: up, down, left, right or the oblique directions, has a corresponding
mind/body state. For example, foods down in the bottom right hand region
will put you into a studious thinker type personality and even a thinker
type body if you eat them long enough. Foods in the bottom left hand region
will put you into a gung-ho workaholic state for getting things done. And
foods in the top left hand region will put you into what I would call party-animal
mode, where you can really have a good time at parties and be more social
and outgoing. And foods at the top right hand region will put you into
what I would call care-bear mode, where you would make a good listener
or carer. So you can experience how foods can influence the mind state
as well as the body state. And you can start to use the foods to put yourself
in the right frame of mind for whatever activity you want to be engaged
in. You can also use the chart to create warmth or coolness in your body.
For example, if you have got to work hard on a hot day then on the positive
effects list on the left hand side corresponding to sodium you'll see it
says "cools you down". So if you look at the corresponding sodium direction
on the CapNaK Chart , celery, for example, could be used to cool down on
a hot day, and conversely bananas over on the right hand side, high in
potassium, will warm you up. You can imagine that your current body-mind
state is at a particular point on the chart. You might describe yourself
as a bit Yin/Alkaline for example. The foods you eat move your body-mind
state around the chart. You can choose which way to go. Another important
point for our times, considering the runaway obesity of western society,
is the fact that the foods in the calcium direction will help you gain
wait and the foods in the phosphorus direction will help you lose weight.
So by eating low calorie - low kilo joule - acidic foods you can help your
body lose weight. For example, looking at the CaPNaK chart green peppers,
cauliflower, mung sprouts, asparagus, brussels sprouts, peas and mushrooms
are foods all reasonably low in calories and have an acid residue in the
body. Therefore they reduce the ability of the body to absorb and hold
fat. This is because calcium in the intestine and blood stream helps the
body absorb fat from the intestines and deposit it into fatty tissue. So
the slight absence of calcium makes it more difficult for the body to retain
or gain weight. So here again it's worthwhile to sit down and study the
positive effects that you can create in each direction. Take time to think
about what you do in your life and how you can use your food to enhance
your performance in whatever you do. That concludes the general discussion
of the CaPNaK Chart. Now I want to proceed to how to eat a live or raw
food diet in a long term healthy way. ^ to top How to eat a live or raw
food diet in a long term healthy way. Why would one bother going against
the mainstream attitudes and try to eat a predominantly live raw food diet?
First of all, lets look at the problems of our society in terms of health.
Billions of dollars are being spent on health every year. Many people are
having enormous health problems and spending a large proportion of their
income and tax on maintaining their health, whether it be through herbs,
supplements, all the way through to drugs and eventually to surgery. Now,
the US Surgeon General, who would be considered to be the No. 1 doctor
in the world, has publicly stated that 70% of diseases are nutritionally
related. These are the words of an incredibly conservative member of the
establishment. Even he is saying that 70% of all diseases are nutritionally
related. So, that gives us the option of reducing our disease rate enormously
if we can improve our nutrition. You will probably be familiar with the
fact that over the last couple of decades there has been a real drive to
reduce the amount of fat that people eat in their diet. The "sad diet"
or the standard Australian diet is essentially, about, 50% fat intake.
The other extreme was created in the well known Pritikin diet which recommended
only about a 10% FAT intake. Current government recommendations are to
eat about a 30% fat intake and some heart and diabetes groups recommend
about 20% fat intake. There is also the recent Zone diet which recommends
a 30% fat intake. The basic approach to almost all these lower fat diets
is to say that people should move onto more carbohydrate in their food
rather than the protein foods which tend to carry the saturated fats and
cholesterol along with them. Also, another reason for moving onto the carbohydrates
is to provide a nice clean source of fuel for the body in the form of carbohydrates.
Carbohydrates don't produce the same acidic effects which a high protein
intake has on the body due to the nitrates and uric acid formed by protein
metabolism. However when we look at the CaPNaK Chart we see that the high
carbohydrate foods tend to be down in the lower portion of the chart in
the acid area. This is very important because it's well known that acidity
in the diet leaches calcium from the bones and will contribute to osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis is a growing plague in our society and should be taken seriously
by everybody. People in high grain eating societies such as the Japanese
have a long history of fear of osteoporosis in old age. A lot of Japanese
men are very frightened that they will slip over during their walk home
from the pub and break their pelvis and have real problems. The solution
is not to go back to a high meat diet because meat is equally as acidic
in terms of the calcium/phosphorus balance, but even more acidic in terms
of the high protein content, creating extra acidity. So when we are faced
with this question of osteoporosis we have to look outside the conventional
meat-grain-beans type of approach to eating. So would we move to dairy
products? Well, OK, everybody knows that dairy products are high in calcium
but actually the high protein in dairy products has an acid effect and
reduces the alkaline/calcium benefits of the dairy products. This applies
particularly to adults who do not utilise much protein for growth. Also,
dairy products tend to stimulate excretion of a lot of mucous in the digestive
tract, especially the nose and throat, providing a breeding ground for
various bacteria and viruses, and contributing to colds and infections.
Dairy products also tend to create allergic reactions, and many people
are lactose intolerant especially as they get older, as they move out of
childhood. However, if you look at the CaPNaK Chart there are some green
vegetables that are higher in the Alkaline direction than dairy products.
For example, just above dairy products there are spinach, kale and silverbeet.
So these green vegetables, when eaten in sufficient quantities, are an
excellent replacement for dairy products in the diet as a source of calcium.
There are also many other high calcium green vegetables you can use, which
are not so Yang, such as broccoli and okra. See the Yin-Alkaline quadrant
of the CaPNaK chart. After all that putting down of meat and grain, beans
and dairy products, you might be wondering "well what can I eat to get
some energy?". Obviously vegetables don't contain enough energy to enable
you to thrive. So there is only one option left for getting the energy
and that is fruit. Food Chakras Before we look more closely at fruit, I
want to talk about the different levels of nutrition. It’s important to
realise that different practitioners have different views depending on
their basic approach to nutrition. To provide a map so you can understand
where people are coming from, I've developed a set of seven levels which
I call the food chakras. Starting with the lowest those levels are: Junkivore-
in other words a junk food eater. Carnivore- avoiding junk food but eating
a lot of meat. Piscavore- avoiding meat and eating a lot of fish or poultry.
Vegetarian- avoiding flesh and tending to eat a lot of grain and dairy
products. Macrobiotic- shying away from dairy products but still heavily
into grain and beans. Vegan- renouncing animal products, eating more fruit
and salads in the diet than the macrobiotic, but still eating cooked foods
daily. Symbiotic - which is a raw food eater who eats mainly fruit as the
major source of energy, and usually eats raw vegetables, nuts and seeds.
Now, as we progress up these levels we actually do have to give up certain
foods or reduce them down to a minimum in our diet. For example, someone
who is a macrobiotic has stopped eating red meat. This process of moving
up the food chakras is abhorrent to many people because it means giving
up some foods that they currently enjoy and are used to eating. But the
essential point is that, in this process of giving up something that we
enjoy in the short term, we get enormous benefits in the long term. We
experience greater health and longevity, and generally enjoy life more
due to our state of health. Its a case of giving up a short term pleasure
for a long term benefit. So if you are not willing to give up the short
term pleasures for long term benefits then perhaps what I have to say is
fairly irrelevant to you. However as people mature they tend to realise
the importance of this approach. So they are the people that this information
is directed to. Are you one of them? Raw Benefits Getting back to the raw
food approach, the idea is that you get your major source of energy from
fruit. I recommend that 70% of the diet, say 7 serves out of 10 would be
fruit and 25% of serves would be greens, green leaf vegetables. The remaining
5%
would be nuts, seeds and perhaps a very small quantity of animal products.
The first thing that comes to peoples’ minds when they hear about this
sort of approach is "there is too much sugar in all that fruit - it's terrible".
You have got to remember that the sugar in fruit is not sucrose. It is
fructose, which has a much more gentle effect on the body and bloodstream
- it comes into the bloodstream much more slowly. Also the sugars in fruit
are mainly bound into the cellular structure so, again, they are released
slowly and gently into the blood stream. The beneficial cellular structure
of raw food is destroyed by cooking. Slow release of sugars from raw food
keeps your insulin level low. This is a major health benefit also aimed
at by the popular, but higher protein, Zone diet. Another way to keep the
blood sugar stable and insulin level low is to graze. Forget the 3 meals
a day belief system. With the raw food approach 6 to 8 meals a day is much
better. Eat a sweet or savory meal depending on your taste at the time.
It's important to realise that one of the major reasons for moving into
a raw food diet is because any cooking, any heating of any foods above
50 degrees centigrade or half way to boiling point destroys the enzymes
in food. The enzymes in food are very important because they actually help
you digest the food. Now if you destroy the enzymes in food then the body
has to produce all the digestive enzymes and acids that are required to
digest the food. This puts a big load on the pancreas and stomach. So when
we take the load off the pancreas and stomach we are actually taking the
biochemical load off the endocrine system. Since the endocrine system is
also responsible for the immune system, for immunity, we actually allow
some of that biochemical energy to be redirected from digestion over towards
immunity. Hence our immunity escalates much higher on a raw food diet.
This accounts for the fact that many people are reducing cancers and eliminating
cancers from their body by using the raw food approach. Their immune systems
become strong enough to destroy cancer. In addition to eliminating osteoporosis,
resistance to infection and cancer are other key long-term health benefits
of a raw food diet. Some people prefer to follow their instincts in choosing
raw foods. This can be assisted by touching and smelling the available
foods. However many people also need to have an intellectual methodology
to help over-ride their negative conditioning. To enable people to move
into a raw food diet without any worries about the danger of deficiencies
and so on, I've developed a simple diet which I call the Core Raw Diet.
^ to top Core Raw Diet Now the core raw diet consists of 5 bananas, 6 large
oranges, 4 sticks of celery, 1/2 kilo of broccoli or equivalent dark green
leaf vegetables and 2 handfuls of nuts and seeds every day. This diet is
just under 20% fat. Think of these foods as your staples, just like bread,
meat and milk might once have been. Amazingly, according to food composition
data, this diet will give full nutrition to a 70 kilogram person, with
the exception of vitamin B12. Smaller people could get full nutrition on
less food. However the Core Raw Diet is low in calories, low in kilo joules
so in effect if an active 70 kilogram person ate those proportions of fruits,
vegetables and nuts then they would tend to lose weight. So, on top of
the Core Raw Diet, you should add whatever fruits and vegetables you wish
to add, especially those that are fresh and in season. Now, in addition
to these five food components there are five basic rules you must follow
if you want to be successful in eating the raw food diet. ^ to top The
Five Basic Rules of Raw Eating The first rule is to have enough fruit to
eat - this is incredibly important! Most people who switch to a raw food
diet find it very difficult to eat sufficient quantities initially. Now
that's a great thing because we are all so used to restricting ourselves
and not being able to eat this or that and trying to keep our weight down
or whatever. Well, in this case, you can go for it - eat heaps of fruit
especially, and its vitally important to eat 5 pieces of fruit before 10.00
a.m. - that will get you off to good start for the day, get your blood
sugar level nice and smoothly high, and you'll be ready to zoom through
the day. Morning grumpiness and cravings are often due to low blood sugar,
so try to always get yourself off to a good start. A small person who doesn't
want to lose weight must eat a minimum of 12 pieces of fruit a day. By
"a piece of fruit" I mean fruit equivalent to a medium sized apple. A big
person must eat a minimum of 15 pieces. More if you are active. The second
rule is to eat 1/2 kilo or 500 grams of dark greens. Now thats really important
to get your sufficient calcium intake and also iron and many other trace
minerals. Considerable protein can also be obtained from dark green vegetables.
The third rule is to eat at least 4 sticks of celery a day. Now this is
also very important. 4 sticks of celery a day will give you your basic
sodium requirements. Have more on hot days. If you don't get your basic
sodium requirements you'll go Yin and you'll have some high potassium /
low sodium symptoms such as weakness, dizziness, fainting, headache or
feeling passive. During the transition to a raw food diet some people experience
a cleansing crisis as stored toxins are released from their tissues. The
negative symptoms can often be dramatically reduced by eating more salty
vegetables such as celery. So its quite important to keep those 4 sticks
of celery going in every day spread through the day, especially around
noon, because they are an important cooling food. And the fourth rule is
to have two handfuls of nuts and seeds a day. Now I would particularly
recommend men to at least include one handful of green pumpkin seeds because
of their high zinc content. When you are doing a high level of physical
activity then you may need to eat 3 or 4 handfuls of nuts and seeds a day
to provide a higher fat and protein intake. You must also increase your
intake of other raw foods to provide sufficient energy and water etc. The
fifth rule is to have a source of B12 in the diet. After about 5 to 10
years on a very low animal food diet you'll probably run low in your stores
of B12. Few people produce enough B12 in their digestive tract to maintain
their stores. So its important, I think, right from the word go, to pre-empt
that, and introduce some food source of B12. You can get B12 from animal
products such as fish. One or two hundred grams of fish each week is a
good idea. If you don't want to eat animal foods then I would suggest that
you try a teaspoon of spirulina every day and/or take a B12 supplement,
because it's quite difficult or impossible to get B12 in sufficient quantities
from ordinary vegetables. There are some fermented foods such as tempeh
or kombucha that you may be able to get a decent amount of B12 from. It's
important to realise that B12 comes in different forms and not all are
readily utilised by humans so it's necessary to check your sources. Think
carefully about the B12 issue early on because if you go deficient in B12
then you may suffer nerve damage, brain damage or become anemic. You should
also get a B12 check with your doctor every couple of years and take immediate
nutritional action if you drop below the medical minimum. Now returning
to the chart with this idea in mind of the high fruit based diet, fruit
is slightly Yin of the centre. Almost all fruit’s clumped very specifically
in this area, slightly to the right of the centre. However rather than
worrying about becoming too Yin on a fruit based diet it's possible to
balance up a Yin based diet with some Yang raw foods. Celery, which is
off to the left hand side in the sodium/Yang area, is ideal for this purpose.
That’s why it's included in the Core Raw diet and also why I suggest that
everybody on a raw food diet should eat 4 sticks of celery a day. Alternatively,
any of the other Yang greens such as spinach for example are also very
good especially considering that they contain a high calcium content as
well. Now it's important to realize that some greens and fruit are Yin/Alkaline
so these are important calcium sources as well. So for example Broccoli
is a major Yin/Alkaline green vegetable and oranges are an important Yin/Alkaline
fruit. People may be surprised to hear that oranges are alkaline because
everyone knows that oranges are so acidic. But it's important to understand
that the acidity is in the juice - that orange juice is the acidic component.
So, if you have an orange, try to have the whole orange as there is a lot
of alkaline/calcium in the pulp which balances out the acidity of the juice.
However, I don't wish to imply that you should eat the peel. It may cause
tooth problems. It's interesting that juice generally tends to be more
acidic than the fruit or vegetable it's juiced from. For example you'll
see on the chart that carrots are balanced between the acid and alkaline
areas, just to the left of the centre in the yang direction. Carrot juice
is immediately below the carrots, well into the acid area of the chart.
So it turns out to be a fallacy that Carrot juice is alkaline. Its certainly
more alkaline than many seeds and nuts, but it definitely does not have
a nett alkaline effect on the body. Now I don't recommend eating large
quantities of nuts and seeds in a raw food diet. Nuts and seeds are quite
acidic - they are high in phosphates. Some people believe that almonds
are a good source of calcium. However, the high phosphate content of the
almonds means that more calcium is dragged out of the bones, by the phosphate,
than is deposited. So if you want to have a source of fat that is alkaline
rather than acidic then the only one that I know of which is viable is
unhulled tahini. Now, unhulled tahini, which is made from unhulled sesame
seeds, is above the centre of the CaPNaK Chart right up high in the alkaline
area. And in the opposite direction, down in the acid area, you'll find
hulled sesame seeds. So it's important to know that tahini made from hulled
sesame seeds is actually a very acidic food, whereas unhulled tahini is
a very alkaline food. So don't use hulled tahini as a way of avoiding osteoporosis,
as it will actually contribute to osteoporosis. You will now understand
that in the core raw diet I mentioned earlier, there is an acid-alkaline
balance between oranges and bananas, and also between broccoli and nuts
and seeds. All these foods are Yin and are balanced by the celery which
is yang. So, long-term CaPNaK balance and control can be maintained by
eating these foods. In guiding people on a raw food diet I encounter a
few very common problems. I would like to briefly mention those so that
as you try the raw food diet you'll bear them in mind and avoid the pitfalls.
^ to top Food Combining and other issues The first problem is bad food
combining. If you eat a lot of vegetables and fruit together then you may
start to suffer from gas build up in your intestines. Now this is very
bad for digestion of food, and reduces nutrient absorption from the intestines.
When a portion of the intestine is filled with gas it means that the intestine
wall is not in full contact with the food. This reduces the absorption
of nutrients. So it's very important to avoid creating gas from bad food
combining. If you notice excessive gas forming in your intestines then
experiment with your combinations of fruit with other foods to find the
causes. Unripe fruit such as bananas can also create gas. Another factor
in food combining is that you may eat cake or other grain based carbohydrates
from time to time, just due to your conditioned cravings or at a social
event. Then it's important to avoid eating any fruit for at least two hours
after eating carbohydrate. Then you won't get the fruit mixing with the
carbohydrate in the intestines and causing fermentation and gas. Another
problem that people run into is that they go low in sodium. This happens
with many healthy diets and not only a raw food diet. People who go off
all sodium supplements such as soy sauce, miso, high sodium dairy products
and meat, find they start to get the Yin symptoms. For example, indigestion
often occurs when your body gets so low on sodium that the muscles in their
intestines can't contract properly. Also water is not well absorbed and
diahorrea can occur. It's quite important to avoid this low sodium problem
by religiously eating at least 4 sticks of celery a day. Another problem
is that people become low in blood sugar. This happens when they don't
eat enough fruit. Often people find that they have difficulty in eating
more than about 5 pieces of fruit a day just because of the volume. So
one way you can increase your fruit intake is to decrease the amount of
fluids you drink. You can provide all the fluids you need by eating fruit.
Remember that the fruit's about 90% water, so if your eating 12 - 15 pieces
fruit a day then your getting around 2 litres of water from the fruit!
So it's not actually necessary to drink water at all unless you are in
a physically demanding situation or perhaps in extremely hot weather. You
can satisfy your body's needs for water by eating a lot of fruit. That
will also reduce the possibility of becoming low in blood sugar. Because
the bloodstream gets a constant supply of sugars as the fruit's digested.
Now the indicators to watch for with low blood sugar are that you start
to slur your speech, your hands start to shake, or you lose some coherence
of thought. Conversely, a great benefit of a high fruit diet is that thinking
can become very clear as a result of the supply of sugars to the brain.
The brain is a major burner of sugar in the body. Another problem that
often occurs on a raw food diet is that you start to go low in Vitamin
B. This is because you have not eaten enough green vegetables. The broccoli
and dark greens are an excellent source of Vitamin B. So if you start to
develop cracked lips, or cracked corners of the mouth, or start to become
low in energy, that may be a result of going low in Vitamin B due to not
eating enough green vegetables. Finally a typical problem is getting dry
skin. Often this is due to not eating enough nuts and seeds and therefore
not getting enough fats in their food intake. So if you take into account
all these problems and take appropriate action as soon as you begin to
notice the symptoms then you'll find that you can move into a raw food
diet very easily. You can then start to feel the benefits of raw food in
your daily life. You can start to use foods, according to the CaPNaK balance
and control principles, to influence your body and mind states to achieve
optimum performance in whatever you do. I would like to conclude by saying
that if you want to get more information on these approaches to nutrition,
then I suggest you buy my book "Eco Eating - A Guide to Balanced Eating
for Health and Vitality". See the illustration below: The Book - Eco-Eating
The book has 50 small chapters all on eating for different aspects for
every day life. For example there are chapters on eating for immunity,
eating for digestion, energy, weight gain, weight loss, cooling, warming,
eating for the seasons, eating for cravings, addictions, travel, sleep,
work, sport, action, sex, eating for the environment, and eating for a
new society. These are just a few of the chapters you can read and enjoy.
You can get my book by direct mail order by sending a $25 Australian dollar
bank draft and your return address to: Sapoty Brook (eco-eat) P.O. Box
8, Repton, NSW 2454, Australia. I’ll send you a copy of my book by return
mail. For secure credit card payment in US$ click here. For internal Australian
orders please send $20 only. The CaPNaK Chart The CaPNaK Chart The CaPNaK
Chart is available. Send a $8.00 Australian dollars bank draft and your
return address to: Sapoty Brook (eco-eat) P.O. Box 8, Repton, NSW 2454,
Australia. For secure credit card payment in US$ click here. For internal
Australian orders please send $6.00 only. The Chart and Cassette Package
Also available is this information in the form of a cassette with CaPNaK
chart and detailed Symptoms and Benefits Diagrams which illustrate a clearer
understanding of the process of Eco-Eating. The CaPNaK chart is a large
full colour wall poster. This package is available. Please send a $15.00
Australian dollars bank draft and your return address to: Sapoty Brook
(eco-eat) P.O. Box 8, Repton, NSW 2454, Australia. For secure credit card
payment in US$ click here. For internal Australian orders please send $12.00
only. Or alternately, you can email me to inquire of other methods of payment
to obtain any of these items by clicking . There is quite a lot more information
on how to use food for healing, health, and performance. So if you are
interested in pursuing this further, I would be very happy to provide you
with a copy of my book. Also, you can send me your address if you would
like to hear about my seminars, retreats, lectures or video. Most people
find it difficult initially settling into a raw food diet. I would like
to help you do this, or at least try raw food. You can consult me by email,
my minimum fee is $20 (by Australian dollars bank draft; or to pay by credit
card in US$ click here). Please inquire . Thank you for reading. I wish
you a fruit-full life. Sapoty Brook !attention! To see another amazing
product by Sapoty Brook click here ^ to top © Sapoty Brook, 1999.
May be downloaded from the web, but not copied in any other way without
written permission from the author. ---------------------- Comments on
the many Boycott post repeats. YES Let's act!!! All those brands are owned
by Zionist companies contributing and supporting the criminal and racist
state of israel. Boycotting those brands is our contribution in the fight
against the criminal and racist state of Israel. Several and seriouse informations
concerning those brands and the way they are contributing to the criminal
israely economy are available on the internet link « inminds.com
». Please spread this message and image as large as you can, to your
friends, family, etc... Thank you A.S -------------------- Evidence (english)
by observer 11:14am Thu Mar 14 '02 One person keeps reposting this several
times per day, and I notice the one thing he always lacks in any evidence
tying these companies to Israel. I suspect there is none, and that this
person is a fool. I suspect that this person is merely targeting Jews,
and that these companies are simple big names with Jews in management positions
(for instance, Michael Eisner runs Disney). This kind of pathetic race
baiting does no good, but a great deal of harm. A boycott against Israeli
businesses is a great idea, but do your homework and find out what companies
are really supporting Israel and HOW they are supporting it. -------------------
.... (english) by Mahakaal 11:18am Thu Mar 14 '02 The boycott of certain
brands that promote or have trade with Israel is all well and good, but
posting the same thing about 4 times a day I think just manages to piss
people off. Information is good.Though I recommend you do it post this
less frequently. ------------------ just follow the link for the evidence
(english) by qtaro 11:29am Thu Mar 14 '02 Apart from a few ZioNazi apologists,
I think most people on indymedia are in favor of a boycott on Israel until
it changes it's nazi-like behavior. It's no different that the boycott
of South Africa that happened a decade ago. I welcome reminders every few
hours for all the newcomers. Anyone demanding censorship of the BOYCOTT
ISRAEL campaign is immediately suspect as a ZioNazi stooge. Oh, and http://www.israelshamir.net
is a good site as is http://www.zmag.org and http://www.counterpuch.org
. . . www.inminds.com/boycott-israel.html ------------------ Zionazi Stooge
(english) by Beery 11:36am Thu Mar 14 '02 "Anyone demanding censorship
of the BOYCOTT ISRAEL campaign is immediately suspect as a ZioNazi stooge"
No one's asking for censorship. What we're asking for is a little respect
for the people who have to wade through these pieces of non-news every
few hours. ----------------- boycott israel (english) by qtaro 11:36am
Thu Mar 14 '02 http://www.counterpunch.com not org :( www.counterpunch.com
--------------------- Reply to Mr Observer (english) by A.S 11:46am Thu
Mar 14 '02 Of course Mr Observer, those companies are effectively supporting
Israel. A research has been made on those companies and their investements
in the israeli criminal economy. You can find the informations concerning
each company on the site inminds.com (by cliking on the name of the company
to boycott, it will lead you to the file where you can find all the informations
with the sources). But if you dont have the time, i can send you all the
informations and sources i am talking about. (just give your Email adress).
Now, on the fact that i already published this message several times, i
really dont see what bothers you in that???!!! I only see one reason :
you are a zionist supporter who can't stand boycotting the criminal state
of Israel. But be sure : NOTHING will keep us from fighting against zionsts
like you and against the criminal state of Israel and its Adolf Sharon.
NO JUSTICE NO PEACE. KNOW JUSTICE KNOW PEACE. A.S ---------------- sdfgsdfg
(english) by sdfg 11:56am Thu Mar 14 '02 We had the Boycott of jewish shops
in Nazi-Germany. That now "anti-facists" are doing the same is making me
very sad...there should be better ways to act... ------------------- A.S.
(english) by Mahakaal 12:06pm Thu Mar 14 '02 Don't be an idiot and go around
accusing people of being zionist apologists, or zionist whatever. You only
discredit the Palestinian struggle by piling such accusations against those
who might actually be trying to help. --------------- Bad analogy (english)
by fd 12:33pm Thu Mar 14 '02 >sdfg The only problem with your analogy is
that it is a false one. These are not Jewish shops, but multi-billion dollar
companies who are directly supporting an oppresive government (right now
there are 5 times as many troups in the West Bank then the US has in Afghanistan).
---------------- Replay to THIS boycott and to THIS web site (english)
by Ignacio 2:11pm Thu Mar 14 '02 I agree with boycott against Israel State,
the same as it was done against South-African Apartheid but, before trusting
the web site of this campaign, please, have a look at the other parts of
it. Have a look at the anti-feminist part of the web: http://www.inminds.com/feminism-muslim-response.html
This web site is a fucking boldshit of religious fundamentalists!!!! This
is not acceptable in Indymedia! THE ENEMIES OF EQUALITY BETWEN WOMEN AND
MEN, ARE OUR ENEMIES. LET'S FIGHT AGAINST THEM THE SAME WE FIGHT AGAINST
THE STATE OF ISRAEL!!! NO GOD, NO MASTER!!! Salud ------------------ Answer
to Ignacio (english) by A.S 3:58pm Thu Mar 14 '02 Dear Ignacio.. Boycotting
Israel does not mean supporting the site's ideas. But it happens that this
site has made some serious research on the companies supporting Israel.
Several informations and articles (with the sources) on those zionist companies
are available on the site. Now, our fight is on this level purely economic
and it is against the criminal and racist state of Israel. We do support
women in their fight against sectarian ideologies (which are not always
religious ideologies) as well as we support the palestinian women against
the barabarian zionist soldiers and on all levels. And of course we are
for equality between men and women on all levels, but we dont agree with
you when you say "No God, No master" cause people are free to believe in
whatever they want. and we can believe in God and be against racisme, against
zionisme, against facisme and against all the ideologies that exclude people
because of their color, race or religion!!! A.S ----------------
Fisk in the independent - When Bush starts squinting his vision narrows
and people start dying 14 March 2002 Middle East crisis It is the "vision"
thing again. When President George Bush wanted Arab support for the US
bombing of Afghanistan in September, he suddenly announced he had a "vision"
of a Palestinian state. Then it disappeared off his radar screen. Yet now
it's back in a watered-down, US-framed UN resolution that affirms "a vision
of a region where two states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side..." |
Could it be that Mr
Bush has another war in mind for the region, that perhaps Vice-President
Dick Cheney, now touring the Arab world and Israel, wants Arab support
for an attack on Iraq? UN resolutions don't disappear as fast as presidential
"visions" and the world now has the idea – and it's only an idea – embedded
in a serious UN document. Indeed, it's probably the first time the UN has
had a "vision" about anything. But it fails to address the far more important
point of UN Security Council resolution 242 of 1967, upon which the Oslo
agreement was supposed to have been founded. It calls for Israeli withdrawal
from territories it occupied in the Six Day War. Yesterday's UN resolution
makes no reference to the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza (nor to
the occupied Syrian Golan Heights) and thus presents the world with an
image, or "vision", of two sides fighting on level ground. When it "demands
immediate cessation of all acts of violence, including all acts of terror,
provocation, incitement and destruction...", it is unclear whether the
Security Council believes Israel is occupying Palestinian land or whether
it thinks that the Palestinian Authority is occupying Israel. Which is
why the original Syrian draft resolution, which specifically talked about
Israel as the "occupying power", was withdrawn – along with its call to
Israel to respect the Geneva Conventions protecting civilians under occupation.
Syria abstained from the vote. Israel's UN ambassador called the latest
resolution "balanced". The only verbal connection between the new resolution
and the all-important 35-year-old 242, which specifically refers to occupation,
is the vaguely worded call for the states to live "within secure and recognised
borders". No mention of Jewish settlements for Jews and Jews only on Arab
land, no mention of east Jerusalem as a Palestinian capital, or a right
of return for any refugees. Like the Oslo agreement, this latest resolution
leaves these critical issues out of the "vision", as presumably something
to be resolved later. It was left to the UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan,
to express his revulsion at the current level of violence, to refer specifically
to Israel's "illegal occupation" and to "morally repugnant" Palestinian
suicide bombings. This is better than nothing but Mr Annan's words are
not written into any resolution. The Security Council, now that the US
has weakened its new resolution, makes no moral judgements at all, even
though the illegality of Israel's occupation partly hinges on the Council's
own 242 resolution calling upon Israel to withdraw. As always, the Arabs
– anxious not to alienate the Americans – had to clap their hands at the
"vision" bit, as if it contained the seeds of Palestinian sovereignty.
Yasser Abed Rabbo, the so-called Palestinian Information Minister, said
it represented a "defeat" for the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon
– which is nonsense because the US would not have proposed the text unless
it met with Israel's approval – and called for "direct international intervention
to implement this resolution through ending the Israeli occupation and
evacuating all the Israeli settlements" from Palestinian land. But there's
nothing about international intervention in the UN text, nor about settlements.
All in all, then, a pretty vision, to run alongside Saudi Crown Prince
Abdullah's own watered-down version of resolution 242. Let's see how much
it helps Mr Cheney as he seeks approval for yet another Middle East war.
------------- Systematically tearing nations apart... (english) by Greg
Palast interviewed by Alex Jones 2:31pm Wed Mar 13 '02 (Modified on 6:53pm
Wed Mar 13 '02) "We are exposing that they are systematically tearing nations
apart, whether it's Ecuador or Argentina. The problem is some of these
bad ideas are drifting back into the U.S. In other words, they have run
out of places to bleed." AJ: This is earth shattering. Can you break it
down for us and tell us what the economists have done? GP: Well, I'll tell
you two things. One, I spoke to the former chief economist, Joe Stiglitz
who was fired by the (World) Bank. So I, on BBC and with Guardian, basically
spent some time debriefing him. It was like one of the scenes out of Mission
Impossible, you know where the guy comes over from the other side and you
spend hours debriefing him. So I got the insight of what was happening
at the World Bank. In addition, he did not brief me but I got some other
sources. He would not give me inside documents but other people handed
me a giant stash of secret documents from the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund. AJ: So to insulate himself, somebody else did it. GP: No,
I'm telling you. He wouldn't touch it but I really did get from completely
independent sources a big stack of documents. AJ: Just like you got W199I,
from the same folks we got it from. GP: And so one of the things that is
happening is that, in fact, I was supposed to be on CNN with the head of
the World Bank Jim Wolfensen and he said he would not appear on CNN ever
if they put me on. And so CNN did the craziest thing and pulled me off.
AJ: So now they are threatening total boycott. GP: Yea right. So what we
found was this. We found inside these documents that basically they required
nations to sign secret agreements, in which they agreed to sell off their
key assets, in which they agreed to take economic steps which are really
devastating to the nations involved and if they didn't agree to these steps,
there was an average for each nation that signed one-hundred and eleven
items that they are required to sign on to. If they didn't follow those
steps they would be cut-off from all international borrowing. You can't
borrow any money in the international marketplace. No one can survive without
borrowing, whether you are people or corporations or countries - without
borrowing some money and having some credit and ... AJ: Because of the
debt inflation pit they've created. GP: Yea, well, see one of the things
that happened is that - we've got examples from, I've got inside documents
recently from Argentina, the secret Argentine plan. This is signed by Jim
Wolfensen, the president of the World Bank. By the way, just so you know,
they are really upset with me that I've got the documents, but they have
not challenged the authenticity of the documents. First, they did. First
they said those documents don't exist. I actually showed them on television.
And cite some on the web, I actually have copies of some... AJ: Greg Palast
dot com? GP: Yea, gregpalast.com. So then they backed off and said yea
those documents are authentic but we are not going to discuss them with
you and we are going to keep you off the air anyway. So, that's that. But
what they were saying is look, you take a country like Argentina, which
is, you know, in flames now. And it has had five presidents in five weeks
because their economy is completely destroyed. AJ: Isn't it six now? GP:
Yea, it's like the weekly president because they can't hold the nation
together. And this happened because they started out in the end of the
80s with orders from the IMF and World Bank to sell-off all their assets,
public assets. I mean, things we wouldn't think of doing in the US, like
selling off their water system. AJ: So they tax the people. They create
big government and big government hands it off to the private IMF/World
Bank. And when we get back, I want to get to the four-parts that you elegantly
lay out here where they actually pay off the politicians billions to their
Swiss bank accounts to do this transfer. GP: That's right. AJ: This is
like one of the biggest stories ever, Sir. I'm sorry, please continue.
GP: So what's happening is - this is just one of them. And by the way,
it's not just anyone who gets a piece of the action. The water system of
Buenos Aires was sold off for a song to a company called Enron. A pipeline
was sold off, that runs between Argentina and Chile, was sold off to a
company called Enron. AJ: And then the globalists blow out the Enron after
transferring the assets to another dummy corporation and then they just
roll the theft items off. GP: You've got it. And by the way, you know why
they moved the pipeline to Enron is that they got a call from somebody
named George W. Bush in 1988. AJ: Unbelievable, Sir. Stay right there.
We are talking to Greg Palast. BREAK AJ: We are talking to Greg Palast.
He is an award-winning journalist, an American who has worked for the BBC,
London Guardian, you name it, who has dropped just a massive bomb-shell
on the Globalists and their criminal activity. There is no other word for
it. You link through at inforwars.com, you can link to his web site - gregpalast.com,
or any of the other great reports he has been putting out. He now has the
secret documents. We have seen the activity of the IMF/World Bank for years.
They come in, pay off politicians to transfer the water systems, the railways,
the telephone companies, the nationalized oil companies, gas stations -
they then hand it over to them for nothing. The Globalists pay them off
individually, billions a piece in Swiss bank accounts. And the plan is
total slavery for the entire population. Of course, Enron, as we told you
was a dummy corporation for money laundering, drug money, you name it,
from the other reporters we have had on. It's just incredibly massive and
hard to believe. But it is actually happening. Greg Palast has now broken
the story world-wide. He has actually interviewed the former top World
Bank economist. Continuing Sir with all these points. I mean for the average
person out there, in a nutshell, what is the system you are exposing? GP:
We are exposing that they are systematically tearing nations apart, whether
it's Ecuador or Argentina. The problem is some of these bad ideas are drifting
back into the U.S. In other words, they have run out of places to bleed.
And the problem is, this is the chief economist, this is not some minor
guy. By the way, a couple of months ago, after he was fired, he was given
the Nobel Prize in Economics. So he is no fool. He told me, he went into
countries where they were talking about privatizing and selling off these
assets. And basically, they knew, they literally knew and turned the other
way when it was understood that leaders of these countries and the chief
ministers would salt away hundreds of millions of dollars. AJ: But it's
not even privatization. They just steal it from the people and hand it
over to the IMF/World Bank. GP: They hand it over, generally to the cronies,
like Citibank was very big and grabbed half the Argentine banks. You've
got British Petroleum grabbing pipelines in Ecuador. I mentioned Enron
grabbing water systems all over the place. And the problem is that they
are destroying these systems as well. You can't even get drinking water
in Buenos Aires. I mean it is not just a question of the theft. You can't
turn on the tap. It is more than someone getting rich at the public expense.
AJ: And the IMF just got handed the Great Lakes. They have the sole control
over the water supply now. That's been in the Chicago Tribune. GP: Well
the problem that we have is - look, the IMF and the World Bank is 51% owned
by the United States Treasury. So the question becomes, what are we getting
for the money that we put into there? And it looks like we are getting
mayhem in several nations. Indonesia is in flames. He was telling me, the
Chief Economist, Stiglitz, was telling me that he started questioning what
was happening. You know, everywhere we go, every country we end up meddling
in, we destroy their economy and they end up in flames. And he was saying
that he questioned this and he got fired for it. But he was saying that
they even kind of plan in the riots. They know that when they squeeze a
country and destroy its economy, you are going to get riots in the streets.
And they say, well that's the IMF riot. In other words, because you have
riot, you lose. All the capital runs away from your country and that gives
the opportunity for the IMF to then add more conditions. AJ: And that makes
them even more desperate. So it is really an imperial economy war to implode
countries and now they are doing it here with Enron. They are getting so
greedy - they are preparing it for this country. GP: I've just been talking
to, out in California just yesterday, from here in Paris, the chief investigators
of Enron for the State of California. They are telling me some of the games
these guys are playing. No one is watching that. It's not just the stockholders
that got ripped off. They sucked millions, billions of dollars out of the
public pocket in Texas and California in particular. AJ: Where are the
assets? See, everybody says there are no assets left since Enron was a
dummy corporation - from the experts I've had on and they transferred all
those assets to other corporations and banks. GP: Well yea, this stuff
has really gone just like a three-card Monty game. I mean remember that
there is money at the bottom. You did pay California's electric bills according
to the investigations, they are telling me that they were pumped up unnecessarily
by 9 to 12-billion dollars. And I don't know who they are going to get
it back from now. AJ: Well they actually caught the Governor buying it
for $137 per megawatt and selling it back to Enron for $1 per megawatt
and doing it over and over and over again. GP: Yea, the system has gotten
completely out of control and these guys knew exactly what was happening.
Well, you have to understand that some of the guys who designed the system
in California for deregulation then went to work for Enron right after.
In fact, here I'm in London right now and we have, the British has some
responsibility here. The guy who was on the audit committee of Enron, Lord
Wakeham. And this guy is a real piece of work, there isn't a conflict of
interest that he hasn't been involved in. AJ: And he is the head of NM
Rothschild. GP: There isn't anything that he doesn't have his fingers in.
He's on something like fifty Boards. And one of the problems, he was supposed
to be head of the audit committee watching how Enron kept the books. And
in fact, they were paying him consulting fees on the side. He was in Margaret
Thatcher's government and he's the one who authorized Enron to come into
Britain and take over power plants here in Britain. And they owned a water
system in the middle of England. This is what this guy approved and then
they gave him a job on the board. And on top of being on the board, they
gave him a huge consulting contract. So you know, this guy was supposed
to be in charge of the audit committee to see how they were handling their
accounts. AJ: Well, he is also the head of the board to regulate the media.
GP: Yes, he is, because I have run into real problems, because he regulates
me. AJ: They are also trying to pass laws in England where you've got an
800-year old well, or in some cases a 2000-year old well that the Romans
built that's on your property and they say we are putting a meter on it.
You can't have your own water. GP: Yea, and that's Lord Wakeham. I mean
this is the guy from Enron. He is a real piece of work. He can't be touched
here because like I say he actually regulates the media. So if you complain,
he's got his hand on your pen. AJ: Burrow into NM Rothschild, you'll find
it all there. Go through these four points. I mean you've got the documents.
The IMF/World Bank implosion, four points, how they bring down a country
and destroy the resources of the people. GP: Right. First you open up the
capital markets. That is, you sell off your local banks to foreign banks.
Then you go to what's called market-based pricing. That's the stuff like
in California where everything is free market and you end up with water
bills - we can't even imagine selling off water companies in the United
States of America. But imagine if a private company like Enron owned your
water. So then the prices go through the roof. Then open up your borders
to trade - complete free marketeering. And Stiglitz who was the chief economist,
remember he was running this system, he was their numbers man and he was
saying it was like the opium wars. He said this isn't free trade; this
is coercion trade. This is war. They are taking apart economies through
this. AJ: Well look, China has a 40% tariff on us, we have a 2% on them.
That's not free and fair trade. It's to force all industry to a country
that the globalists fully control. GP: Well, you know Walmart - I did a
story, in fact, if you read my book. Let me just mention that I've got
a book out, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" about how, unfortunately,
America has been put up for sale. "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" is
coming out this week. But I have a story in there about how Walmart has
700 plants in China. There is almost nothing in a Walmart store that comes
from the United States of America, despite all the eagles on the wall.
AJ: Exactly, like 1984, then they have big flags saying "Buy American"
and there's hardly anything --- it's Orwellian double-think. GP: What's
even worst is they will hire a factory and right next to it will be the
sister factory which is inside a prison. You can imagine the conditions
of these workers producing this lovely stuff for Walmart. It's really....
AJ: And if an elitist needs a liver, they just call. GP: (Laughs) I know,
it's grim. In fact, I talked to a guy, Harry Wu, is his name and, in fact,
he broke into, he's been in Chinese prison for 19 years. No one believed
his horrible stories. He actually broke back into prison, took a camera
with him and took pictures of the conditions and said this is the conditions
of factories where Walmart is getting its stuff made at, it's all.... AJ:
I was threatened to be thrown off TV here in Austin when I aired video
of little girls 4-years old chained down, skinnier than Jews in concentration
camps, to die. And I was threatened, if you ever air that again, you will
be arrested. GP: Well you know, it is horrifying stuff that, unfortunately,
I have been handed and Stiglitz, was very courageous for him to come out
and make these statements. Like I said, he didn't provide me the documents.
The documents really sealed it because it said this is what really happened.
They really do say sign on the dotted line agreeing to 111 conditions for
each nation. And the public has no say; they don't know what the hell is
happening to them. All they know.... AJ: Go back into privatization. Go
through these four points. That's the key. It sends billions to politicians
to hand everything over. GP: Yea, he called it briberization, which is
you sell off the water company and that's worth, over ten years, let's
say that that's worth about 5 billion bucks, ten percent of that is 500
million, you can figure out how it works. I actually spoke to a Senator
from Argentina two weeks ago. I got him on camera. He said that after he
got a call from George W. Bush in 1988 saying give the gas pipeline in
Argentina to Enron, that's our current president. He said that what he
found was really creepy was that Enron was going to pay one-fifth of the
world's price for their gas and he said how can you make such an offer?
And he was told, not by George W. but by a partner in the deal, well if
we only pay one-fifth that leaves quit a little bit for you to go in your
Swiss bank account. And that's how it's done. AJ: This is the .... GP:
I've got the film. This guy is very conservative. He knows the Bush family
very well. And he was public works administrator in Argentina and he said,
yea, I got this call. I asked him, I said, from George W. Bush. He said,
yea, November 1988, the guy called him up and said give a pipeline to Enron.
Now this is the same George W. Bush who said he didn't get to know Ken
Lay until 1994. So, you know..... AJ: So now they are having these white-wash
hearings. You know I was at Enron yesterday in Houston because I'm now
here in Austin. We were like 30-feet from the door, right on the sidewalk
and I have it on video - goons came up and said you can't videotape. I
said go ahead and have me arrested. I mean I'm talking on the sidewalk,
Greg. GP: Well, you know, I was there in May, telling people in Britain
you've never heard of Enron, but ... And these are the guys who have figured
out how to (garbled) this government. In fact, we saw some interesting
documents, a month before Bush took office, Bill Clinton, I think to get
even with Bush's big donor, cut Enron out of the California power market.
He put a cap on the prices they could charge. They couldn't charge more
than one-hundred times the normal price for electricity. That upset Enron.
So Ken Lay personally wrote a note to Dick Cheney saying get rid of Clinton's
cap on prices. Within 48 hours of George W. Bush taking office, his energy
department reversed the clamps on Enron. OK, how much is that worth
for those guys. You know that has got to be worth, that paid off in a week
all the donations. AJ: Listen at the bombs you are dropping. You are interviewing
these ministers, former head of IMF/World Bank economist - all of this,
you've got the documents, paying people's Swiss Bank accounts, all this
happening. Then you've got Part 2, what do they do after they start imploding?
GP: Well, then they tell you to start cutting your budgets. A fifth of
the population of Argentina is unemployed, and they said cut the unemployment
benefits drastically, take away pension funds, cut the education budgets,
I mean horrible things. Now if you cut the economy in the middle of a recession
that was created by these guys, you are really going to absolutely demolish
this nation. After we were attacked on September 11, Bush ran out and said
we got to spend $50 to $100 billion dollars to save our economy. We don't
start cutting the budget, you start trying to save this economy. But they
tell these countries you've got to cut, and cut, and cut. And why, according
to the inside documents, it's so you can make payments to foreign banks
- the foreign banks are collecting 21% to 70% interest. This is loan-sharking.
If fact, it was so bad that they required Argentina to get rid of the laws
against loan-sharking. because any bank would be a loan-shark under Argentine
law. AJ: But Greg, you said it yourself and the documents show it. They
first implode the economy to create that atmosphere. They institute the
entire climate that does this. GP: Yea, and then they say, well gee, we
can't lend you any money except at these loan-shark rates. We don't allow
people to charge 75% interest in the United States. That's loan-sharking.
AJ: Part 3 and Part 4. What do they do after they do that? GP: Like I said,
you open up the borders for trade, that's the new opium wars. And once
you have destroyed an economy that can't produce anything, one of the terrible
things is that they are forcing nations to pay horrendous amounts for things
like drugs - legal drugs. And by the way, that's how you end up with an
illegal drug trade, what's there left to survive on except sell us smack
and crack and that's how... AJ: And the same CIA national security dictatorship
has been caught shipping that in. GP: You know, we are just helping our
allies. AJ: This is just amazing. And so, drive the whole world down, blow
out their economies and then buy the rest of it up for pennies on the dollar.
What's Part 4 of the IMF/World Bank Plan? GP: Well, in Part 4, you end
up again with the taking apart of the government. And by the way, the real
Part 4 is the coup d'etat. That's what they are not telling you. And I'm
just finding that out in Venezuela. I just got a call from the President
of Venezuela. AJ: And they install their own corporate government. GP:
What they said was here you've got an elected president of the government
and the IMF has announced, listen to this, that they would support a transition
government if the president were removed. They are not saying that they
are going to get involved in politics - they would just support a transition
government. What that effectively is is saying we will pay for the coup
d'etat, if the military overthrows the current president, because the current
president of Venezuela has said no to the IMF. He told those guys to go
packing. They brought their teams in and said you have to do this and that.
And he said, I don't have to do nothing. He said what I'm going to do is,
I'm going to double the taxes on oil corporations because we have a whole
lot of oil in Venezuela. And I'm going to double the taxes on oil corporations
and then I will have all the money I need for social programs and the government
- and we will be a very rich nation. Well, as soon as they did that, they
started fomenting trouble with the military and I'm telling you watch this
space: the President of Venezuela will be out of office in three months
or shot dead. They are not going to allow him to raise taxes on the oil
companies. AJ: Greg Palast, here is the problem. You said it when you first
came out of the gates. They are getting hungry, they are doing it to the
United States now. Enron, from all the evidence that I've seen was a front,
another shill, they would steal assets and then transfer it to other older
global companies, then they blew that out and stole the pension funds.
Now they are telling us that terrorism is coming any day. It's going to
happen if you don't give your rights up. Bush did not involve Congress
and the others who are supposed to be in the accession if there is a nuclear
attack in the secret government, Washington Post -"Congress Not Advised
of Shadow Government." We have the Speaker of the House not being told.
This looks like coup d'etat here. I'm going to come right out with it.
We had better spread the word on this now or these greedy creatures are
going to go all the way. GP: I'm very sad about one thing. I report this
story in the main stream press of Britian. I'm on the BBC despite Lord
Wakeham. I know he doesn't like me there. I'm in the BBC, I'm in the main
daily paper, which is the equivalent of the New York Times or whatever,
and we do get the information out. And I'm just very sorry that we have
to have an alternative press, an alternative radio network and everything
else to get out the information that makes any sense. I mean this information
should be available to every American. I mean, after all, it's our government.
### At http://www.GregPalast.com you can read and subscribe to Greg Palast's
London Observer columns and view his reports for BBC Television's Newsnight.
********** Primitive accumulation of capital in conteporary times. www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=125&...
add your own comments Very frightening (english) by Dhunter 4:08pm Wed
Mar 13 '02 When you look at the whole picture and not just at isolated
incidents, it seems that the corporations are SPEEDING UP THEIR TIMETABLE
for world domination. I myself had thought that their power-grab would
accelerate after 2005, here in the Western Hemisphere anyway, when the
FTAA kicks in. But this interview reminds of a quote from the Book of Revelations
in the Bible: "The beast knows its time is short". It seems to me that
we could be facing a process that is over in MONTHS rather than years.
Primitive Accumulation (english) by wwicko 6:53pm Wed Mar 13 '02 In the
age of discovery, populations in the new world were exterminated and their
resources taken by European imperialist. This activity was the source of
accumulated capital for the European empires. This activity, which might
be called "plundering," was called by Karl Marx "primitive accumulation
of capital." Primitive accumulation of capital is the only real source
of capital, or material inputs, for the economic system we refer to as
capitalism. Capitalism is premised on infinte exponential growth, or infinite
exponential accumulation of material wealth. The problem is that there
are real material limits to economic growth. As is argued at www.dieoff.com,
the earth is a sphere, a sphere is finite, thus the resources contained
therein are finite. A system, such as capitalism, premised on infinite
growth in a finite environment will eventually begin to reach those limits,
at which time the capitalists will likely begin to hoard the few remaining
resources (i.e. Oil in the Caspian Region, and fresh water supplies). It
is getting more difficult for capitalists to acquire inputs for their system
because we are nearing the limits of our finite sphere and the easy pickings
are already consumed. For efficiency in acquiring the remaining resources,
the mechanism of primitive accumulation has been institutionalized in the
form of the international banking system headed by the IMF and the World
Bank. The dictates of this institution are enforced by the US military.
Another factor in this historical process is that the human beings who
weren't suffering antisocial personality disorder have resisted the ugly
truth that is the heart of capitalism. It is an economic system that must
kill and consume to survive. At the end of the age of discovery, those
human beings with an intact social instinct resisted the destruction of
cultures for the purpose having luxury foodstuffs and linens. These intact
human beings also resisted slavery, which is an another form of primitive
accumulation. Once they understood how perverse these activities were,
intact human beings said, "No more." (When will we understand that wage-slavery
is not freedom?) Back to my original line of thought. With all this resistance
going on, the process of destruction that is necessary for the capitalism
to continue has been, as George Orwell knew it would be, propagandized.
The ugly truth is distorted, and the true motives for the ongoing destruction
of what remains of the world are concelaed behind a number of meaningless
rationales such as humanitarian missions, a war on drugs, and a war on
terrorism. Soon there will be precious little left to possess that is not
already possessed by capitalists. At this point the economic system of
Capitalism will collapse because there will be no further opportunity for
primitive accumulation, and this centuries long Ponzi scheme will be over.
Unfortunately, for most of us, the process will be very messy and very
lethal. I wonder if at that point the "material preconditions for the socialization
of the means of production" (Marx) will be present and the proletariat
will usher in some golden age? Its kinda like waiting for Christ to return.
--------------- THE STATE OF MIND - December 18, 2001 By Israel Shamir
The steep slopes of Wadi Keziv in Western Galilee are walled by squat local
oaks and thorny bush. On the streambed, oleanders and cypresses look into
shallow ponds formed by its springs. I like this secluded canyon. On hot
summer days, one can hide in an intricate deep cave and laze in its cool
clear waters, waiting for deer and hoping for a nymph. On cooler days,
you can climb up a steep spur rising amidst the gorge. It is called qurain,
the Horn, in Arabic, hence the Arab name of Wadi Keziv, Wadi Qurain. Astride
the spur, the Crusader castle of Monfort raises its donjon high and gazes
towards the distant Mediterranean Sea. This place holds many memories.
The 12th century Zionists, Teutonic knights of St Mary fortified the castle
on the spur, and called it Starkenberg, the Mount of Strength. The name
and the remote location didn't help: they were defeated by Salah ad-Din,
the Arab paragon of valour and compassion, who allowed them to depart with
their weapons and honour for Eastern Europe. The stony path leading to
the spring was the meeting ground of the enchanting characters of Arabesques,
an exquisite novel by the Palestinian writer Anton Shammas. Shammas, a
native of nearby Fassuta, is probably the only non-Jew in the world who
writes his books and poems in Israeli Hebrew. Farther west, the brook of
Keziv flows into the sea at the ruins of az-Ziv, the Christian village
destroyed by Jews in 1948. In this village, in the long-gone 1920s, a local
Palestinian girl was visited by another local Palestinian woman, the Virgin.
In other words, it is a typical place in the unusual land of Palestine.
These days, you can roam the canyon all by yourself. It is as empty of
people as the rest of countryside. The land of Palestine is in trouble,
the deepest trouble since the black nights of 1948. People do not venture
down here anymore, leaving the canyon to its lean and wiry boar. Walking
downstream, I spotted a few of these gracious animals, so different from
their domesticated cousins. It was only outside the gorge, on the plain
of Acre that I came across a human presence. There were a few Thai or Chinese
peasants working the fields of a local kibbutz. A middle-aged kibbutznik
sat in the shadow overseeing their work. I joined him for a smoke and a
drink of cold water. He was the epitome of a good Israeli, large, sunburned,
with a friendly smile, bushy mustachio and brisk talk. Fifty years ago,
he or rather his predecessor, a fighter of the Jewish Storm Troopers, the
Palmach, would seize the lands of az-Ziv and expel its peasants to Lebanon.
Thirty years ago, he would work the stolen land with his own hands. Now,
he oversees the Thais working this land. Very soon, he told me, he will
go to New York, to visit his son, a web designer. While he is away, some
Russians from Maalot town will be hired to oversee the Asian workers for
the kibbutz. Not many Jews are interested in working the land, or even
in overseeing Thais working it, he said. The kibbutz hopes to get a building
permit, build housing and sell the real estate. It is a valuable site,
near Naharia and Acre, and it will fetch a premium price, despite the crisis,
he said. I shook hands and bid farewell to him, to the sweaty Thais, to
the green fields, to the mountains of Lebanon to the north, concealing
the refugee camps where dwell the original inhabitants of as-Ziv, to the
Galilee mountains to the east, holding the Russian town of Maalot. I hitched
a ride to Nahariya, and from there, I took a train homewards to Jaffa.
The train carried a few Africans, probably illegal immigrants judging by
their shy demeanour. A Romanian building team was gulping beer and burping
loudly. They were imported from their impoverished East European land to
build the houses for elderly Russian immigrants. Just like in California,
the Israeli Jews do not want to be employed in construction. A Jewish Israeli
lawyer in black yarmulke leafed through papers in his semi-opened briefcase.
A blond and armed Israeli soldier talked Ukrainian with its fricative h's
to his corpulent girlfriend. He extolled his own heroic fight against multitudes
of Arab terrorists under her admiring eyes. A group of Moroccans discussed
the closure of the Acre steel plant and their slim chances of finding other
work. The crisis is deepening, one of them said. It is as bad as in 1966.
The train rolled through Haifa, and I thought of the hundreds of thousands,
maybe millions of Americans, Jews and Christian Zionists, who lobby, pray,
support and pay - no, not for the Jewish state built on the ruins of Palestine,
as they imagine. That would be bad enough. But the reality is worse. I
thought of the millions of Palestinians, rotting in refugee camps and jails,
dispossessed, expelled, - victims not of Jewish greed for land, as they
imagine, but of something worse - of a ghost. The Jewish state is a virtual
state that is quickly losing all remaining connection to reality. This
ghost of a state kills people and collects money in America; it continues
some nefarious existence, like the legal term, 'estate of the deceased'.
Its fields are worked by imported guest workers, guarded by imported Russians
and Ethiopians, explained by Israeli professors who are forever off lecturing
in American universities and by brave generals on the lookout for a big
kickback from American weapon-makers. Unemployment grows daily, vital services
are on strike; the tourist industry has collapsed months ago. Hotels are
boarded up and other branches of the national economy are close to collapse.
Israelis buy flats in Florida and Prague, while houses in Israel go begging
for buyers. Sharon's desire to punish the Palestinians has the sting of
punishing one's own left hand. Palestinians and Israelis are intertwined
and integrated, and this separation kills the economy of both. From far
away America, Israel looks like a giant nuclear state, the great ally of
the United States, a Jewish state that is a source of pride for American
Jews. A visitor leaves our shores with a strong feeling of our identity
and prosperity. Only we, permanent residents, know that it is a cardboard
sham. Israel is collapsing, as its active citizens emigrate in despair,
while generals complete the destruction of the country. A cruel fate befalls
the native Palestinians: a ghost kills them, a spiritless body walking
the corridors of the Congress and the deserts of the Middle East in Zombie-like
trance. For the sake of this spectre, important American Jews squeeze every
penny from their employees and countrymen, cut down on pensions to old
and assistance for children, reduce the health and education budget, dry
up help to Africa and Latin America, build improbable coalitions with notorious
racists of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell's kind, demand destruction of
Iraq, bless the bombing of Afghani refugees, keep Afro-Americans in their
ghettos, undermine their host society, make enemies for themselves and
for America. These deeds would be vile enough even if they would accomplish
something of value to someone, but they are worse because they are useless.
The Zionist experiment has practically collapsed. It can run for many yeas
to come on life-support, as a brain-dead vegetable. It can kill people,
maybe even start the next world war. But it cannot become alive. The Jewish
state of Israel is a state of mind, a projection of the American Jewish
mind. The worries and problems it articulates are American Jewish problems.
For Israeli 'Jews', there is no need for segregation, war, or subjugation
of natives. We eat no bagels with lox, speak no Yiddish, read no Saul Bellow
or Sholom Aleichem, and avoid synagogues. We prefer Arab food and Greek
music. My neighbourhood has seven pork butchers to a kosher one. Forty
per cent of Tel Aviv weddings are done outside Jewish framework: young
Israelis prefer to go to Cyprus to get married, just to avoid contact with
Rabbis. Tel Aviv is the gay capital of the Middle East, though according
to Jewish law, gays should be exterminated. If American Jews did not bribe
Israelis on a large scale, we would just forget about the Diaspora and
dissolve into the hospitable Middle East. If they continue to bankroll
us, we shall oblige them with a small show of Jewishness. We are master-sellers
of illusion, and as long as there are buyers, we shall provide the goods.
In 1946, a group of dedicated men from all over the world came to Palestine
under the aegis of the UN. They were sent to prepare the ground for partition
of the land. Among other places, they visited the southernmost kibbutz,
Revivim in the arid Negev. There, they came across a wonderful flowerbed
with roses, anemones, and violets in front of the kibbutz office. In their
report, the members of the delegation expressed their amazement and stated,
'Jews make the desert bloom, let them have the Negev'. As they left, the
kibbutz youngsters went out and pulled the already dying flowers out of
the sand. They had just bought the flowers same morning on the Jaffa market
and had planted them as props for the duration of the visit. This small
outlay of cash had transferred Negev with its two hundred thousand Palestinians
to the Jewish state. Most of the natives were expelled across the newly
drawn border, to the camps of Gaza or Jordan. It was cruel and useless:
even now, fifty years later, the Negev south of Beersheba has a smaller
population than in 1948. In order to populate depopulated lands, the Mossad
broke and terrorised the Jewish communities of North Africa. The Jews were
brought in, sprayed with DDT lice-killer and placed into refugee camps
that soon became the towns of Netivot, Dimona, Yerucham. They are still
there, in the stark desert outpost towns full of unemployment and misery,
drawing social benefits and nursing a deep dislike for the Ashkenazi Jews
who lounge in Tel Aviv's cafes. It is probably the only place on earth
where you are liable to hear, 't'is pity you did not burn in Auschwitz'.
Thus the conjuring tricks of Revivim, the conquest of Negev, the expulsion
of Palestinians and the destruction of the Moroccan Jewish community succeeded
separately, but ultimately failed altogether. It could be expected: evil
and immoral deeds cannot bear good fruit. Zionist leaders dreamed of making
Palestine as Jewish as England is English. They failed. Palestine is as
Jewish as Jamaica is English. The land of Palestine is being ruined now,
in front of our very eyes. Its beautiful old villages are bombed to oblivion;
churches are emptied of their flocks; olive trees are uprooted. Such ruin
has not befallen the land since the Assyrian invasion 2700 years ago. Nothing
can comfort us in the face of this great destruction, and certainly the
people responsible for it - whether Israeli killers or their American Jewish
supporters - will be damned forever. Still, a wry irony of history will
remain as a footnote in the books: the Jewish leadership committed these
crimes in vain, and received no gain out of it. Even if the last Palestinian
were to be crucified on the hill of Golgotha, even that would not breath
life into the virtual Jewish state of Israel. --------------------
>Kelley merely despises democracy and therefore sneers at all the >methods
by which democracy can be made an actuality rather >than of leaders swaying
through advertising and *her* kind of >manipulative slogans rather than
the leninist slogan which summarizes >and gives focus to the practice of
the people themselves. Her >boorish sneering at slogans while utterly ignorant
of the history of >their political use gives the lie to her claims of extensive
political >practice. She has rather engaged in bureaucratic dominance based
>on intellectual charisma. i did say a thing about slogans carrol. i didn't
sneer one way or another except to laugh at people who i knew would reject
slogans and yet engaged in their use in a game of oneupmanship. so, i conclude
that the meds need to be adjusted coz you're hearing voices again. as for
my take on democracy well here it is again from my post on working class
civil society of which you've heard some about from patrick bond, except
adapted for the US. if you think the below, which is about how to foster
the building of demcratic practices and institutions is undemocratic, you've
got some strange notions of democracy. somday, try looking into the solidarity
movment because much of what we did in the community of which i speak was
modeled on that experience. -----paste----- for one thing, ehrenreich is
being pragmatic and she's asking people to engage in political practice.
get involved and *do* something that will help people and in the process
you might bridge the consumer divides, instead of investigating one's navel
for lint and classifying it according to some ossified typification of
real politics, to wit: > I know it sounds scary, but it will be a lot less
so if we can make >sharing stylish again and excess consumption look as
ugly as it actually >is. Better yet, give some of your time and your energy
too. But if all you >can do is write a check, that's fine: Since Congress
will never >redistribute the wealth (downward, anyway), we may just have
to do it >ourselves. --------------- yoshie: >Ehrenreich is the Martha
Stewart of progressive politics, for Ehrenreich >thinks that housework
is a _moral_ issue _for women_, a spiritually >uplifting testimony to women's
industriousness . actually, she's talking about how the *shared* experience
of gendered labor in the form of housework--the social conditions of labor--gave
us something in common. now, the division of labor and the commodification
of what was once unpaid labor presents us as enemies, as she astutely notes.
the answer, at least one, for her is to create alternative political practices,
as i mentioned above. no, it's not radical or marxist as you would have
it. but if we sit around waiting for the time to be right for radical,
marxist change we'll be sitting around forever. marx surely didn't say
that we could only pursue radical political practices, but must take a
side in the struggles and wishes of the age and move them progressively
forward. she's drawing on an approach that in sociology is evident in the
lit on "civil society". it is in civil society--in the practices of commitment
to something greater than one's self (in union struggles, in organizing,
in volunteering, etc) that we create shared lifeworlds (habermas) with
people we might not ever come in contact with otherwise. in the process
we learn to see the world from the perspective of someone besides our selves
and those in our "chosen" lifestyle enclaves. in the process, (and this
is habermas's schtick) we learn to create alternative social institutions
in which *we* negotiate the rules through which we decide to live together.
these are social practices that might, just might, present real alternatives
to the colonizing logics of the market and state. this involves morality.
the market encourages a morality of self-interest maximization. "let me
keep my own and i will become, without ever thinking about it, my brother's
keeper". the state encourages a morality of obedience to rules said to
be in the service of the greater good: people who one does not know, but
nonetheless depends on through vast intricate divisions of labor. (when
that division of labor breaks down through strikes or disasters we realize
just how much we need people all over the globe in order to enjoy modern
conveniences) civil society, on the other hand, creates and is sustained
by practices of reciprocity and we learn how to create, for ourselves,
the rules by which we are to live together. (and this, i think, is what
sam, brett, eric, i [and maybe angela] often are on about: where do people
fit in? where do we, in this coming utopia, become part of the process
of deciding how it is that we ought to organize our lives. which is why
i think brett's parecon model is interesting but also problematic ] we
might get involved for all the wrong reasons, too. moralistic, selfish,
whatever. my students, for ex, talk about working with the special olympics
simply because they wanted to put that work on their applications to college.
however, in the process, they learned about a world they never would have
known existed and that turns them into people who are much more sympathetic
to the daily lives of the disabled. to bore frances to tears, i'll mention,
yet again, the anti nuke dump protests. while people started out protesting
from a NIMBY position, their involvement in that struggle put them in contact
with people engaged in similar struggles all over the world: latino communities
in texas, ukrainian communities, etc. rural whites were in contact with
those from worlds that, from a distance, they could easily ignore and belittle.
but the shared experience of capital/state oppression made them realize
connections they would never have realized had they not gotten involved
with. they can no longer take the view of observer and ignore and belittle.
"those" people are no longer "those" people. as demonstrated by numerous
social movement studies done on that community and others, these people
went on to get involved in other environmental issues. issues they might
never have cared about before. also, their NIMBY critique turned into a
larger critique of, at first, the state and then of capitalism -- a critique
of the capitalist economy that produced nuclear waste in the first place.
a critique that recognized that it was power companies who were trying
to shuffle the cost of doing business off onto taxpayers, who were make
us pay for the disposal of waste. people also got involved n issues they
might not have cared about were it not from direct involvement--involvement
that they took up themselves for selfish, moralistic, pious reasons to
begin with. this had real consequences when plant closings hit the communities.
1. they were much more cognizant of the rippling effects of the economy
and much more concerned about the people in mexico who were the would be
beneficiaries of the relocation. this, i would contend, is very likely
a direct result of their political engagement in the anti nuke dump protests.
2. their active engagement in struggle meant that they felt a sense of
efficacy--that they could accomplish something, that it was do-able. a
decade of such struggle and involvement, in turn, meant that the last time
a plant announced that it would be closing up shop, the workers walked
out on the spot. just up and left. and, unlike earlier plant closing announcements,
many more people spoke out against the practice. and many more people were
on the side of the workers who were working for minimum wage in a plant
that had promised all kinds of things to that community in order to get
tax abatements: we tore down houses, an entire street, at county expense
for that plant and they paid not one red cent in taxes. five years later,
they packed up and left. a normally very docile community was radicalized
by their involvement in alternative institutions in civil society. twenty
years before, a community sat idly by with a "fuck us over we like it attitude"
toward corporations. twenty years before, the town fathers posted a billboard
on the highway that pretty much announced to the world that we liked getting
fucked over. no more. not after the nuke dump protests. no more, not after
the engagement in protests against the last plant closing. and those engagements
in protest were made possible by civil society *and* by the work of people
thinking about ways to strengthen civil society and to create public spheres
of active, practical engagements with the struggles and wishes of the age.
yes, that would be lousy shit fer brains social scientists, often involved
because they needed the r.a. monies or the research experience or the publications
or because they wanted to piously demonstrate their moralizing concern
for the down trodden. whatever. they couldn't have lasted long in that
project without being affected by it and without learning to see what it's
like in another world-- a world of the rural working poor that they often
disparaged. it was civil society that provided the foundation for the community's
engagement in political practices to begin with. what were they? voluntary
organizations that people often joined out of a sense of pious moralism:
churches, little leagues, the grange, the ywca, book reading groups, women's
league of voters, quilting circles, etc etc etc. how were they the backbone
of a (comparatively) insurrectionary struggle against the state? these
organizations provided the resource and practical infrastructure that enabled
that protest to get off the ground in the first place. they provided a
group of people who were used to donating their time for this or that project.
people who were willing to do the shit grunt work, like typing letters,
licking envelopes, making phone calls, digging up info. people who knew
how to interact with people they didn't always get along with. people who
brought you donuts and hot coffee when you were standing outside the county
office building freezing your tail off waiting from some government official.
while enrenreich ought to go further in advocating such an approach, she
at least did hint that it wasn't enough to write a check out to an organization.
perhaps doug couuld press her on this. nonetheless, i suspect from reading
ehrenreich carefully over the years, she is coming from the above analysis
of what it takes to make social movements work and why it is necessary
to engage in and strengthen alternative social institutions and practices
rather than denouncing them as insignificant. that may well be true in
the long run. i don't know. but my hopelessly optimistic side, one nurtured
by witnessing the transformation i witnessed above, makes me suspect it's
worth a shot. ----------------- |